S ource: DNA
A military conflict between China and Japan is looming, with neither willing to back down over a disputed chain of islands, one of China’s leading foreign policy experts has warned.
The spat over the Diaoyu or Senkaku islands has escalated dramatically in the past month with violent protests in China. But with a national election approaching in Japan, and a change of leadership in China, politicians on both sides have refused to step back from the brink, afraid of appearing weak.
“There is a danger of China and Japan having a military conflict,” said Yan Xuetong, one of China’s most influential foreign policy strategists, and a noted hawk. “I do not see either side making concessions. Both sides want to solve the situation peacefully, but neither side can provide the right approach.”
He warned that unless one side backed down, there could be a repeat of the Falklands conflict in Asia.
“Generally speaking, according to the theory of international relations, unless one country makes concessions to the other, the escalation of a conflict between two countries will not stop until there is a military clash, like between the UK and Argentina,” he said.
He said that China was tolerant with smaller powers. “But the case of Japan is different. There is history between us. Japan is a big power. It regards itself as a regional, and sometimes a world power. So China can very naturally regard Japan as an equal. And if we are equal, you cannot poke us. You cannot make a mistake,” he said.
Yan is the dean of international relations at Tsinghua university, the elite college that schooled both China’s president, Hu Jintao, and his likely successor, Xi Jinping. He is also one of China’s representatives to the Council of Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific, a non-governmental body that coordinates security in the region.
Chinese and Japanese diplomats have met this week for talks over the crisis, but no agreement has been reached.
Yesterday (Thursday), a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry attacked Yoshihiko Noda, the Japanese prime minister, for telling reporters at the United Nations that the islands belonged to Japan.
Noda said: “There are no territorial issues as such. Therefore, there cannot be any compromise that represents a retreat from this position.”
A Chinese foreign ministry statement in reply said: “China is strongly disappointed and sternly opposes the Japanese leader’s obstinacy regarding his wrong position on the Diaoyu Islands issue.”
In the balance is some pounds 216?billion of bilateral trade. Last year, exports to China accounted for three per cent of the Japanese economy.
Several Japanese businesses on the Chinese mainland have had to shut down because of the crisis. Nissan, which relies on the Chinese market for as much as 25 per cent of its revenues, has closed until October 7 after demand for its cars plummeted.
All Nippon Airways said 40,000 reservations had been cancelled on flights between China and Japan from this month to November.
Yan predicted that if there was a military confrontation, the United States would not intervene physically.
“I do not think they will send soldiers to fight against the People’s Liberation Army,” he said. “They [the US] will be involved, but they can be involved in many different ways, providing intelligence, ammunition, political support, logistical help and so on.”
He expected whoever wins the US presidential election to continue to toughen policy on China. “In terms of the economy, China and the US are partners. But in terms of security, they are rivals. American hegemony is based on military capability and the military gap with China. When China narrows that gap, it will scare the US,” he said.
He added that China increasingly needed to change the ideology that guides its foreign policy, namely to focus on the economy and not take a leading role in international relations.
“We have reached the point where China needs to seriously consider having a new policy consistent with its international status,” he said. “I do not know when it will happen, but it will not be too long.”